<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Write For IBMeye</title>
	<link>http://www.blognetworknews.com/2006/write-for-ibmeye/</link>
	<description>Sticking Our Noses In The Blog Networks' Business</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 09:27:19 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: A. Thorne</title>
		<link>http://www.blognetworknews.com/2006/write-for-ibmeye/#comment-76</link>
		<author>A. Thorne</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jun 2006 08:39:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.blognetworknews.com/2006/write-for-ibmeye/#comment-76</guid>
		<description>Heard of &lt;a href="http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=context" rel="nofollow"&gt;context&lt;/a&gt;? If not, let me explain. My statement follows a quote from you regarding IBM Eye being unable to keep a writer, it should then be assumed, based on the context, that my statement applies to IBM Eye.

Because you've obviously read far too much into my statement &lt;em&gt;and&lt;/em&gt; taken it out of context, I'll ask again, when did I say the whole of b5media couldn’t keep a writer?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heard of <a href="http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=context" rel="nofollow">context</a>? If not, let me explain. My statement follows a quote from you regarding IBM Eye being unable to keep a writer, it should then be assumed, based on the context, that my statement applies to IBM Eye.</p>
<p>Because you&#8217;ve obviously read far too much into my statement <em>and</em> taken it out of context, I&#8217;ll ask again, when did I say the whole of b5media couldn’t keep a writer?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://www.blognetworknews.com/2006/write-for-ibmeye/#comment-75</link>
		<author>Jon</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jun 2006 05:31:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.blognetworknews.com/2006/write-for-ibmeye/#comment-75</guid>
		<description>"Don’t know if mentioning that you can’t keep a writer"

Right there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Don’t know if mentioning that you can’t keep a writer&#8221;</p>
<p>Right there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A. Thorne</title>
		<link>http://www.blognetworknews.com/2006/write-for-ibmeye/#comment-74</link>
		<author>A. Thorne</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jun 2006 17:56:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.blognetworknews.com/2006/write-for-ibmeye/#comment-74</guid>
		<description>Jon, 
Please clue me in, when did I say the whole of b5media couldn't keep a writer?

Maybe you should have taken the post in the spirit it was intended - a puckish response to your own words. Or did you forget you wrote you couldn't keep an IBM Eye writer?

&lt;blockquote&gt;Little research next time please, A.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Little respect when commenting on my blog please, Jon. (In other words, learn from Jeremy and Duncan's example.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jon,<br />
Please clue me in, when did I say the whole of b5media couldn&#8217;t keep a writer?</p>
<p>Maybe you should have taken the post in the spirit it was intended - a puckish response to your own words. Or did you forget you wrote you couldn&#8217;t keep an IBM Eye writer?</p>
<blockquote><p>Little research next time please, A.</p></blockquote>
<p>Little respect when commenting on my blog please, Jon. (In other words, learn from Jeremy and Duncan&#8217;s example.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://www.blognetworknews.com/2006/write-for-ibmeye/#comment-73</link>
		<author>Jon</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jun 2006 17:43:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.blognetworknews.com/2006/write-for-ibmeye/#comment-73</guid>
		<description>It's worth mentioning that we have something like 80 bloggers that stay with us. One blog that's hard to man because of its topic is hardly indicative that we "can’t keep a writer"

Little research next time please, A.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s worth mentioning that we have something like 80 bloggers that stay with us. One blog that&#8217;s hard to man because of its topic is hardly indicative that we &#8220;can’t keep a writer&#8221;</p>
<p>Little research next time please, A.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A. Thorne</title>
		<link>http://www.blognetworknews.com/2006/write-for-ibmeye/#comment-71</link>
		<author>A. Thorne</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jun 2006 04:15:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.blognetworknews.com/2006/write-for-ibmeye/#comment-71</guid>
		<description>Understandable Duncan. 

I'd had to see a blog get shut down, so I hope you can find someone to fill the position, but sometimes it's inevitable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Understandable Duncan. </p>
<p>I&#8217;d had to see a blog get shut down, so I hope you can find someone to fill the position, but sometimes it&#8217;s inevitable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Duncan</title>
		<link>http://www.blognetworknews.com/2006/write-for-ibmeye/#comment-70</link>
		<author>Duncan</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jun 2006 03:25:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.blognetworknews.com/2006/write-for-ibmeye/#comment-70</guid>
		<description>I'd also note in terms of writers that like any network (or company for that matter) that we do have turn over in writers, so leave due to personal reasons, some are poached, some want a change. We're proud of our retention rate in terms of bloggers and we really have very low turn over in terms of writers. IBM Eye is just a blog that we've had a couple of writers on, and it's really the exception to the rule, and as Jeremy mentioned, it's very niche in its topic as well. We will be dropping it if we can't find a writer, some blogs work, occasionally some dont :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d also note in terms of writers that like any network (or company for that matter) that we do have turn over in writers, so leave due to personal reasons, some are poached, some want a change. We&#8217;re proud of our retention rate in terms of bloggers and we really have very low turn over in terms of writers. IBM Eye is just a blog that we&#8217;ve had a couple of writers on, and it&#8217;s really the exception to the rule, and as Jeremy mentioned, it&#8217;s very niche in its topic as well. We will be dropping it if we can&#8217;t find a writer, some blogs work, occasionally some dont <img src='http://www.blognetworknews.com/admin/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A. Thorne</title>
		<link>http://www.blognetworknews.com/2006/write-for-ibmeye/#comment-66</link>
		<author>A. Thorne</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 May 2006 03:38:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.blognetworknews.com/2006/write-for-ibmeye/#comment-66</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the confirmation Jeremy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the confirmation Jeremy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy Wright</title>
		<link>http://www.blognetworknews.com/2006/write-for-ibmeye/#comment-65</link>
		<author>Jeremy Wright</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 May 2006 20:15:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.blognetworknews.com/2006/write-for-ibmeye/#comment-65</guid>
		<description>Yep. We won't make an announcement or anything, it'll just drop off the blogroll.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep. We won&#8217;t make an announcement or anything, it&#8217;ll just drop off the blogroll.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A. Thorne</title>
		<link>http://www.blognetworknews.com/2006/write-for-ibmeye/#comment-64</link>
		<author>A. Thorne</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 May 2006 18:59:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.blognetworknews.com/2006/write-for-ibmeye/#comment-64</guid>
		<description>So, I'll assume if b5 can't find a regular contributer to the IBMeye blog, you'll officially close its doors?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, I&#8217;ll assume if b5 can&#8217;t find a regular contributer to the IBMeye blog, you&#8217;ll officially close its doors?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy Wright</title>
		<link>http://www.blognetworknews.com/2006/write-for-ibmeye/#comment-63</link>
		<author>Jeremy Wright</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 May 2006 18:46:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.blognetworknews.com/2006/write-for-ibmeye/#comment-63</guid>
		<description>We considered shutting the blog down. It takes a very specific type of person to write about IBM. We're glad we gave the experiment a shot but it was just that: an experiment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We considered shutting the blog down. It takes a very specific type of person to write about IBM. We&#8217;re glad we gave the experiment a shot but it was just that: an experiment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
