<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Blog Network News</title>
	<link>http://www.blognetworknews.com</link>
	<description>Sticking Our Noses In The Blog Networks' Business</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 11:19:06 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>Comment on Bloggy Networks Welcomes Gadgetizer by A. Thorne</title>
		<link>http://www.blognetworknews.com/2007/bloggy-networks-welcomes-gadgetizer/#comment-1723</link>
		<author>A. Thorne</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2007 15:09:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.blognetworknews.com/2007/bloggy-networks-welcomes-gadgetizer/#comment-1723</guid>
		<description>You're welcome Tiago. 

Gadgetizer is a fine blog and I'm happy for the new direction you are all taking. 

Good luck in your new blog home.

A. Thorne</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re welcome Tiago. </p>
<p>Gadgetizer is a fine blog and I&#8217;m happy for the new direction you are all taking. </p>
<p>Good luck in your new blog home.</p>
<p>A. Thorne</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Bloggy Networks Welcomes Gadgetizer by Tiago G</title>
		<link>http://www.blognetworknews.com/2007/bloggy-networks-welcomes-gadgetizer/#comment-1716</link>
		<author>Tiago G</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2007 02:46:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.blognetworknews.com/2007/bloggy-networks-welcomes-gadgetizer/#comment-1716</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the mention Thorne, I guess the details are suppose to be sketchy :P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the mention Thorne, I guess the details are suppose to be sketchy <img src='http://www.blognetworknews.com/admin/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Good-bye Duncan by Jason Calacanis Leaves AOL - Blog Network News</title>
		<link>http://www.blognetworknews.com/2006/good-bye-duncan/#comment-367</link>
		<author>Jason Calacanis Leaves AOL - Blog Network News</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Nov 2006 22:06:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.blognetworknews.com/2006/good-bye-duncan/#comment-367</guid>
		<description>[...] First, Duncan Riley leaves b5media, now Jason Calanis (of Weblogs, Inc. fame) is leaving AOL. The story was first broken at TechCrunch and then picked up by the New York Times. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] First, Duncan Riley leaves b5media, now Jason Calanis (of Weblogs, Inc. fame) is leaving AOL. The story was first broken at TechCrunch and then picked up by the New York Times. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on b5media Gets Some Money by A. Thorne</title>
		<link>http://www.blognetworknews.com/2006/b5media-gets-some-money/#comment-217</link>
		<author>A. Thorne</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Oct 2006 17:48:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.blognetworknews.com/2006/b5media-gets-some-money/#comment-217</guid>
		<description>Hi Aaron,
Thanks for popping in.

Just to clarify, the statement says "...some dissenting views &lt;em&gt;and other commentary&lt;/em&gt;..." -- Rick was not intended to be lumped into the dissenting views category.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Aaron,<br />
Thanks for popping in.</p>
<p>Just to clarify, the statement says &#8220;&#8230;some dissenting views <em>and other commentary</em>&#8230;&#8221; &#8212; Rick was not intended to be lumped into the dissenting views category.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on b5media Gets Some Money by Aaron Brazell</title>
		<link>http://www.blognetworknews.com/2006/b5media-gets-some-money/#comment-216</link>
		<author>Aaron Brazell</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Oct 2006 13:36:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.blognetworknews.com/2006/b5media-gets-some-money/#comment-216</guid>
		<description>I'm not sure how you draw the conclusion that Rick Segal was a "dissenting view". He is one of the investors.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure how you draw the conclusion that Rick Segal was a &#8220;dissenting view&#8221;. He is one of the investors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Creative Weblogging Looking For Bloggers by Creative Weblogging&#8217;s New Sponsored Blog: - Blog Network News</title>
		<link>http://www.blognetworknews.com/2006/creative-weblogging-looking-for-bloggers/#comment-118</link>
		<author>Creative Weblogging&#8217;s New Sponsored Blog: - Blog Network News</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jul 2006 00:30:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.blognetworknews.com/2006/creative-weblogging-looking-for-bloggers/#comment-118</guid>
		<description>[...] Hopefully this new blog will prove to be as successful as its others, and remember, if you&#8217;re looking for a writing gig, they&#8217;re hiring. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Hopefully this new blog will prove to be as successful as its others, and remember, if you&#8217;re looking for a writing gig, they&#8217;re hiring. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Write For IBMeye by A. Thorne</title>
		<link>http://www.blognetworknews.com/2006/write-for-ibmeye/#comment-76</link>
		<author>A. Thorne</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jun 2006 08:39:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.blognetworknews.com/2006/write-for-ibmeye/#comment-76</guid>
		<description>Heard of &lt;a href="http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=context" rel="nofollow"&gt;context&lt;/a&gt;? If not, let me explain. My statement follows a quote from you regarding IBM Eye being unable to keep a writer, it should then be assumed, based on the context, that my statement applies to IBM Eye.

Because you've obviously read far too much into my statement &lt;em&gt;and&lt;/em&gt; taken it out of context, I'll ask again, when did I say the whole of b5media couldn’t keep a writer?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heard of <a href="http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=context" rel="nofollow">context</a>? If not, let me explain. My statement follows a quote from you regarding IBM Eye being unable to keep a writer, it should then be assumed, based on the context, that my statement applies to IBM Eye.</p>
<p>Because you&#8217;ve obviously read far too much into my statement <em>and</em> taken it out of context, I&#8217;ll ask again, when did I say the whole of b5media couldn’t keep a writer?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Write For IBMeye by Jon</title>
		<link>http://www.blognetworknews.com/2006/write-for-ibmeye/#comment-75</link>
		<author>Jon</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jun 2006 05:31:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.blognetworknews.com/2006/write-for-ibmeye/#comment-75</guid>
		<description>"Don’t know if mentioning that you can’t keep a writer"

Right there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Don’t know if mentioning that you can’t keep a writer&#8221;</p>
<p>Right there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Write For IBMeye by A. Thorne</title>
		<link>http://www.blognetworknews.com/2006/write-for-ibmeye/#comment-74</link>
		<author>A. Thorne</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jun 2006 17:56:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.blognetworknews.com/2006/write-for-ibmeye/#comment-74</guid>
		<description>Jon, 
Please clue me in, when did I say the whole of b5media couldn't keep a writer?

Maybe you should have taken the post in the spirit it was intended - a puckish response to your own words. Or did you forget you wrote you couldn't keep an IBM Eye writer?

&lt;blockquote&gt;Little research next time please, A.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Little respect when commenting on my blog please, Jon. (In other words, learn from Jeremy and Duncan's example.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jon,<br />
Please clue me in, when did I say the whole of b5media couldn&#8217;t keep a writer?</p>
<p>Maybe you should have taken the post in the spirit it was intended - a puckish response to your own words. Or did you forget you wrote you couldn&#8217;t keep an IBM Eye writer?</p>
<blockquote><p>Little research next time please, A.</p></blockquote>
<p>Little respect when commenting on my blog please, Jon. (In other words, learn from Jeremy and Duncan&#8217;s example.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Write For IBMeye by Jon</title>
		<link>http://www.blognetworknews.com/2006/write-for-ibmeye/#comment-73</link>
		<author>Jon</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jun 2006 17:43:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.blognetworknews.com/2006/write-for-ibmeye/#comment-73</guid>
		<description>It's worth mentioning that we have something like 80 bloggers that stay with us. One blog that's hard to man because of its topic is hardly indicative that we "can’t keep a writer"

Little research next time please, A.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s worth mentioning that we have something like 80 bloggers that stay with us. One blog that&#8217;s hard to man because of its topic is hardly indicative that we &#8220;can’t keep a writer&#8221;</p>
<p>Little research next time please, A.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
